Intermediate 6B WB

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

1. You’ll have to_______the ball harder to score a goal.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

2. Don’t_________the door — I’ve just painted it.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

3. Can you_________the soup? I think it might need more salt.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

4. I can_______something burning. Did you turn off the oven?

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

5. When you’re introduced to someone, you should__________say hello, and shake hands.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

6. We often___________our heads when we agree with someone or understand what they’ve said.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

7. Did the audience___________much at the end of the concert?

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

8. Lisa doesn’t like dogs because she thinks they’ll_________her.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

9. loften__________a tune when I’m in the shower.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

10. Don’t drop your sweet papers on the floor.__________them in the bin.

Complete the sentences with the verbs in the box.

11. When I’m abroad, it’s sometimes easier to___________at something I want in a shop.

choose the word with the different sound.

1. train

choose the word with the different sound.

2. phone

choose the word with the different sound.

3. owl

choose the word with the different sound.

4. chair

choose the word with the different sound.

5. ear

choose the correct answers.

1. You must | can’t be tired. You’ve had a long trip.

choose the correct answers.

2. They must / can’t have much money They never go out.

choose the correct answers.

3. Don’t buy Olivera book. He might not | must not like the same kind of things ds you.

choose the correct answers.

4. Paula can’t / might be injured. That’s her best time ever for a marathon.

choose the correct answers.

5. Your neighbour must / might not have a good job. Those cars are really expensive!

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

1. You______be very busy at work. You’re always on Facebook!

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

2. I’m not sure, but the new assistant___________be Italian. Her surname is Rossi.

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

3. Mark passed all his exams. His parents________be very proud.

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

4. Do you really think England will win tonight? You___________be serious! They have no chance!

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

5. Lucy wasn’t feeling well this afternoon, so she_________come to the party tonight. She said she would let us know later today.

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

6. I thought our neighbour was away on holiday, but she___________be — I’ve just seen her in her garden.

Complete the sentences with must, might, might not or can’t.

7. It’s very cold this evening and there’s a lot of cloud. I think it___________snow.

Listen to a radio programme about the history of beauty. choose (Right) the three periods in history that the guest talks about.

Listen again and mark the sentences T (true) or F (false).

Read the article once.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Question:

What is the writer’s opinion of Photoshopping?

Read the article again and choose the correct answers.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Question:

The article says that Photoshopped images have a bad effect on…

Read the article again and choose the correct answers.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Question:

The new program gives a rating of I to an image with…

Read the article again and choose the correct answers.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Question:

People complained about the Rachel Weisz advert because…

Read the article again and choose the correct answers.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Question:

The people who will benefit most from the new tool are…

Complete the sentences with one of the highlighted words or phrases.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Complete the sentences with one of the highlighted words or phrases.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Complete the sentences with one of the highlighted words or phrases.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Complete the sentences with one of the highlighted words or phrases.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.

Complete the sentences with one of the highlighted words or phrases.

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Photoshopping: how much is too much?

Today, it is normal for magazines to show pictures of models and celebrities that have been ‘Photoshopped’. This means that the original photos have been changed on a computer using the Photoshop software to make them look better. The beautiful people in the photographs have perfect skin, no fat on their
stomachs, and no wrinkles on their faces. They look so perfect and beautiful that what we see can’t be real. But some publishers and advertisers insist that Photoshopping is necessary so that celebrities and models always look their best.
On the other hand, health organizations have warned that digitally altering photographs may be dangerous, They say Photoshopped images are not realistic, and may have a negative effect on people. Psychologists agree with the health organizations. They say some people try so hard to look like the pictures in magazines that they get ill. ln some cases, they want to be as slim as the models and so they stop eating properly. When they realize that it is impossible to look so good, they get depressed. This doesn’t only happen to young girls but it can happen to people of all ages. So what can be done to keep everybody happy? Two researchers at Dartmouth University in New Hampshire, USA, think they have found the answer.
Professor Hany Farid and Doctor Eric Klee have developed a computer program that can detect how much Photoshopping has been used on an image, Their software gives a rating from 1 to 5 to the image — 1 for a few changes, and 5 for alot of changes. Farid and Klee’s idea is that publishers include the rating next to the image. That way, consumers will be able to work out how realistic the image is.
News of Farid and Klee’s system has come out at the same time as people have started criticizing the use of Photoshopping. They say that some advertisers are going too far with it. Recently, the actress Rachel Weisz appeared in an advert for an anti-ageing beauty cream in the UK. In the advert, Ms Weisz looked like a teenager —in fact, she’s in her early forties. There were a lot of complaints about the image and the advert was eventually banned. Farid and Klee’s system could solve two problems at the same time. Firstly, it would serve as a kind of health warning for consumers, and secondly it may stop advertisers from relying on Photoshopping so much.